Negative Scenescence, Anyone?
.
Cause of Death.
We’re all used to that phrase –
Almost inoculated against it
From thousands of detective novels
And forensic medicine programmes.
But what exactly IS ‘death’?
At one level, of course,
It’s the total absence of life:
Its discontinuation:
Its ‘cul de sac’
Its very ‘dead’ end.
.
But what is death for?
What purpose might it serve?
Indeed, do we have to die….?
.
Some scientists speak of ‘Scenescence’:
The ‘Force of Natural Selection’
Weakening to the point at which
Life can’t continue to sustain itself
Beyond the urge to reproduce.
.
Does Gravity naturally ‘weaken’ over time?
No, it obeys fundamental laws: is immutable.
.
Does the speed of light lessen
With time or distance?
Clearly not.
.
So why should this supposed
‘Force of Natural Selection’ weaken?
.
Is scenescence, then, nothing more
Than a theoretical ‘mise-en-scene’ –
The best explanation we can find
Until something better comes along?
.
But hang on!
There could be evidence of an upside:
So-called Negative Scenescence,
Whereby one might become
More successful with age
[Yes, but first define ‘success’]!
Predictably, for those of my age,
Evidence for this remains discouragingly ‘sketchy’.
Then there is the Hydra.
Cut off a bit
And it grows another entire body
And lives another entire life.
Wonder whether we can unravel
The potential that might lie there…
.
NB. The photo is of a bust of Mahsati Gandjavi – a renowned Persian poetess – who ‘lives‘ hundreds of years after her time through her poetic output…